death-penality-GettyImages-1609762-1524172219
Getty Images

Arkansas Judge Protests Death Penalty, Accuses State’s Supreme Court Of Racism

Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen calls capital punishment "premeditated murder."

An Arkansas judge refuses to be silenced for speaking out against capital punishment. Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen participated in a vigil and demonstration outside of the Governor's Mansion on Tuesday (April 17) marking the one-year anniversary of the state carrying out eight executions over a two-week period, in a decision marred with controversy as many of the inmates executed reportedly suffered from mental illnesses including bipolar disorder and paranoid schizophrenia.

Due to his feelings against executions, Griffen has been barred from presiding over death penalty cases. During Tuesday’s demonstration, he lay tied to a cot, as dozens of protestors gathered nearby.

According to Arkansas Online, Griffen rose from the cot just after 7 p.m., and when asked why he participated in the demonstration he replied, “We are still killing,” before walking away.

Griffen, who doubles as a Baptist minister, “took part in a peaceful and reverent Good Friday prayer vigil,” at the same location last year to express a “moral and religious opposition to capital punishment,” he wrote in a blog post.

In 2017, Griffen issued a restraining order temporarily blocking the Arkansas Department of Corrections from using the drug vecuronium bromide for lethal injections, and subsequently delayed the string of planned executions.

The order came after the medical supplier filed a lawsuit accusing the state’s DOC of lying about their purpose for purchasing the drug. According to the complaint, which names the state’s governor and Arkansas DOC director Kelly Wendell, officials claimed that the drug would be used for medical purposes, not executions.

As a vocal opponent of the death penalty, Griffen was criticized for ruling over the case. The state filed to appeal the order, which was eventually approved allowing the executions to continue.

Griffen's opinions have also made him a target of state Sen. Trent Garner, who has repeatedly called for his impeachment. On Tuesday, Garner tweeted that Griffen's participation in the recent protest “disgraced the office that he holds” and accused him of using a “desperate, attention seeking move to further bring shame on himself.”

But Griffen appears to be unshaken by detractors and has already filed a civil rights lawsuit against the state’s Supreme Court justices for barring him from presiding over death penalty cases. “In that lawsuit, I challenged the permanent ban issued by the justices of the Arkansas Supreme Court as a violation of my First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, and freedom to exercise my religion, and my Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law (because I was not given notice nor a hearing before it was imposed),” he explained in his blog. “I also challenged the permanent ban as a violation of my Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection under the law (because it is more severe than punishment imposed to white judges who committed notorious and illegal conduct such as accepting a bribe, drunken and reckless driving, and demanding and accepting sexual favors from defendants in exchange for issuing lenient sentences).  And I challenged the permanent ban because it resulted from conspiracy by the justices of the Arkansas Supreme Court and others to deprive me of the powers of my elected office based on animosity against me because I am African-American.”

Last week, a federal court ruled that Griffen’s lawsuit “asserts factually plausible claims against the justices,” and that his civil rights were violated, he wrote. Furthermore, Griffen said that his lawyers are working to “uncover and expose the facts that bear out my legal claims” which he says justices “and others are desperate to hide.”

Though obligated to follow the law, Griffen noted that his ability to do his job doesn’t compel him to “agree with every law,” and that the First Amendment protects his “freedom to hold and express moral and religious opposition to the death penalty, including freedom to peacefully and lawfully question the morality of state-sanctioned premeditated and deliberate killing of people who have been convicted for the premeditated and deliberate killing of other persons.”

“If a person who has been convicted of premeditated murder is deliberately and premeditatedly killed, we should condemn that killing as murder,” he continued. “Murder is wrong, even when the state hires people to do it.  Anger and bloodlust are not excuses for the state to commit premeditated murder of people who have committed premeditated murder for an understandable reason.  Two wrongs don’t make anything right.”

See video of the protest below.

From the Web

More on Vibe

Drew Angerer

Incoming Attorney General Letitia James Planning Investigation Of Donald Trump And Co.

Incoming New York Attorney General Letitia James is planning a sweeping investigation of Donald Trump, his family and anyone associated with the president.

While speaking with NBC News, James said she will use every corner of the law to look at any illegal activity committed.

“We will use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family as well," James said.

Specifically, James will investigate any illegal activity associated with the president's New York real-estate holdings, including the 2016 meeting with a Russian official at Trump Tower and any government subsidies he's received.

"We want to investigate anyone in his orbit who has, in fact, violated the law,” the Democratic attorney general said.

After James announced her forthcoming investigation, Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen will face the music for lying to Congress and violating campaign laws. Cohen faces four years in prison.

READ MORE: Donald Trump "I'm The Least Racist Person...That I Can Tell You"

Continue Reading
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Oscar Grant's Family Advocates To Have Fruitvale Station Named After Him

Nearly 10 years to the day of his passing, Oscar Grant III's family is aiming to build a tangible legacy in his honor. A request to rename Fruitvale Station in Oakland, Calif., the location where Grant was fatally shot by a police officer on Jan. 1, 2009, has been made. At 22, Grant was killed by a Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) officer while he was handcuffed and face down on the train's platform. The officers were responding to a fight on a crowded train and apprehended Grant and other riders.

“It would be an atonement, it would be part of BART saying yes this happened here, we vow that it won’t happen again and we vow to work with the communities and ensure that all people are treated equally,” Wanda Johnson, Grant's mother, said.

According to KGO-TV, BART officials have declared the family's plea unlikely, not based upon the reason of the request, but rather that BART policy requires all stations' names to align with its geographical position. The Oakland transit system will instead install a mural honoring the late father. Currently, in the planning stages, the family also requested a side street at Fruitvale be named after their fallen family member.

Killed in the blink of an eye, Grant's case made him one of the many faces of police brutality. Cellphone cameras caught officers handcuff an unarmed Grant, who was later shot in the back. He died shortly after in a California hospital.

READ MORE: 'Fruitvale Station': Michael B. Jordan On the Many Layers of Oscar Grant 

Continue Reading
Justin Sullivan

Study Shows Gun Violence Cuts African Americans Life Expectancy By Four Years Or More

Gun violence has seeped into the American culture sinking its claws into everyday life. With 53,492 shooting occurring in 2018, the result was more than 13,700 gun-related deaths, reported by the Gun Violence Archive.  A new study led by a professor at Boston University has found that the life expectancy of African-Americans has lowered by more than 4-years due to gun violence.

Based on federal data collected between 2000 and 2016, the research concluded black Americans died more frequently due to homicide among younger ages, although white American gun deaths are linked more so toward suicide amid older folks.

Published Dec. 4 in the BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine journal."Our study using cumulative data from 2000 to 2016 demonstrates a total firearm life expectancy loss of 905.2 days, which is nine times greater than observed in 2000, indicating increasing life expectancy loss by year," wrote Bindu Kalesan, the lead author of the investigation.

Furthering the discussion surrounding firearm injury, Kalesan inferred that gun-related injury causes American's to "lose substantial years." A common misconception surrounding shooting victims, only 30% of people struck by bullets die. However, the trauma endured is now linked to the shortened life expectancy.

One of the studies calculated in the 2000s, "concluded that shootings reduced the average American lifespan by about 100 days, with a significant gap between black and white men: Black men lost 361.5 days, while white men lost 150.7 days," wrote Nick Wing, a journalist at Huffington Post.

Two hundred and eleven days in difference, this study is a clear indication of the racial gap plaguing people-of-color in relation to the inherent violence suffered through life. Gun policy, a clear stain on the American fabric, has become a growing issue, claiming lives by the tens-of-thousands with no clear sign of slowing down. The research illustrates the growing issues within the black community, because not only are we being attacked from all sides, we engage in friendly fire.

READ MORE: Girl Who Penned Essay On Gun Violence Killed By Stray Bullet

 

Continue Reading

Top Stories